by Jason Norris, CFA
Senior Vice President of Research

 The Wealth Effect Rearing Its Head

Shrugging off higher taxes and politics in Washington, consumer sentiment reached levels not seen since 2007. The gains, however, were focused primarily among the higher income earners. The broad University of Michigan Index gained seven points from last month, however, those families earning over $75,000 posted a gain of over 17 points, while those making less rose only two points. Higher home prices and a strong stock market has a significant wealth effect on higher earners, thus instilling higher confidence.

This strength in data fueled Friday’s equity markets to record highs. Specifically, the S&P 500 is up over 17 percent for the first five-and-a-half months of 2013. Robust economic growth has not been the catalyst. While the U.S. economy should continue to grow in the 2 to 3 percent range and corporate earnings are expected to show growth of around 7 percent, a 17 percent move in equities may seem a little frothy. We believe that equities still offer a better risk/reward relative to bonds. With the price-to-earnings multiple on stocks is currently at 15 times the earnings in 2013, this is still below multiples seen in 2007 when the equity markets were last at these levels. Also, with interest rates remaining below 2 percent on the 10-year Treasury, we would not be surprised if price-to-earnings multiples continue to expand into the upper-teens.

Japan Joins the Printing Party

That leads us to that elusive question of when will interest rates start rising in a meaningful way. Central banks around the world continue to flood their economies will currency in order to stimulate growth. The four major central banks (U.S., EU, UK and Japan) have increased their balance sheets by over $5.0 trillion to $9.1 trillion since 2008. Japan has been the most recent country to aggressively purchase securities to increase its money supply. This has resulted in a meaningful depreciation of the Japanese Yen relative to the U.S. dollar. However, the ECB has been shrinking its balance sheet and the Federal Reserve has been giving signals that it may be closer to unwinding its QE program. San Francisco Federal Reserve President John Williams stated earlier this week that the pace of securities purchases could slow as soon as this summer. This will have to be balancing act so rates do not spike. Commenting on how the Fed might end the monthly purchase of $85 billion in fixed income securities, this week the Dallas Fed President stated that, “I don’t want to go from wild turkey to cold turkey,” and “I think we ought to dial it back.” We believe the end game will be the Fed eventually stopping all purchases. However, they will not actively sell bonds to the open market, but rather just let them mature.

Has Gold Lost it Luster?

Collectively, the aforementioned events have resulted in relative strength in the U.S. dollar, which in turn, has led to a major sell off in gold. Friday’s close of $1,364 for an ounce of gold is the lowest level since early 2011. With inflation benign and the dollar holding firm, there may be more downside to gold in 2013.

Our Takeaway from the Week

•  Even with stocks at historic highs, valuations are still reasonable

Disclosures

by Deidra Krys-Rusoff
Portfolio Manager

Ask any municipal bond expert what keeps them awake at nights and I guarantee that concerns over the escalating costs of pensions and post-retirement benefits for municipalities is on their top 10 list. The pension landscape is changing; as costs increase, the balance between fiscal, ethical and moral responsibility becomes more precarious. Analysts worry about how the costs will be funded and whether the costs will impact or interrupt debt repayment. 

I was afforded the opportunity to moderate an expert panel on pension reform at the National Federation of Municipal Analysts annual conference last week and came away believing that while the problems are large, they are not insurmountable. Here are the key takeaways from the experts.

Politicians tend to think about the next two to four years, which is a not productive for pension reform which is an obligation for the next 30 to 60 years (think “kick the can” mentality). As Robert North, chief actuary for the New York City Retirement Systems said, “I have yet to find anyone who would rather not spend the money on other things.” He noted that public pension financing is asymmetric: the more assets and better funded the pension plan is, the more money politicians are willing spend on enhancing plan benefits. Less assets and lower funded pension plans will result in increased employer contributions and less money in the budget for other services. Most politicians do not want to spend today’s money on a future liability. This leads to some government employers not funding their pension plans at sustainable levels. 

Steve Kriesberg, director of collective bargaining and healthcare policy for the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, noted that retiree health spending is projected to rise, but that it is still a relatively modest share of governmental budgets. He also stated that some government reforms that decrease healthcare for government employees may push the costs onto the taxpayer in other ways; such as through state programs for underinsured patients. The labor opinion is that distressed pension situations are relatively few and easy to identify and that bankruptcy is not an effective way to solve the problems. 

Perhaps the most encouraging speaker was Steve Toole, head of North Carolina’s Retirement Systems. He noted that pension reform is underway in many states and local government agencies and that the underfunding can be solved with political will and creative planning. Progressive pension plans are changing their amortization periods from a rolling 30-year cycle to six to 12 years (this increases annual required contributions now, but will stabilize funding in the future). Other reform measures include removing annual cost of living adjustment provisions, decreasing discount rates and extending plan vesting periods. Toole noted that we should expect to see upward pressure on plan contribution rates for the short term, but that the improving stock market may reduce that pressure within the next five to 10 years. 

We believe that increasing pension and pos-retirement healthcare obligations will continue to have an impact on municipality balance sheets, but that this won’t immediately impact their ability to make bond interest payments. Reform is slowly becoming more palatable to politicians as taxpayers are paying closer attention to benefit costs, which should ease some of the pressure. We will continue to pay close attention to this issue and monitor our client’s municipal bond holdings. 

Disclosures

by Shawn Narancich, CFA
Vice President of Research

 Sell in May? Not on this Day

 Defensive sectors like telecom, utilities, and healthcare don’t typically lead stocks to new bull market highs, but through the first four months of this year, that is exactly the odd circumstance investors have observed. A recent string of softer economic reports (both domestically and overseas), stubbornly low Treasury yields and weak trading volumes have fed investor skepticism about the underlying strength of a stock market that once again set a new high on the S&P 500 this week. Only time will tell if a late-week rally in cyclicals will reverse a trend of year-to-date underperformance, but count us as pleased to see a market led higher by elements signaling better economic health. In that regard, the Labor Department’s latest read on jobs was surprisingly upbeat, as net non-farm payrolls expanded at a faster rate in April. Net new job creation of 165,000 certainly isn’t a barn-burning number, but when combined with the upward revisions made to both February and March figures, the jobs picture all of a sudden doesn’t look so bad. Once again, the unemployment rate dropped, this time to 7.5 percent. Surprisingly weak construction spending and lower levels of manufacturing activity reported domestically and in China remind investors that a global economy facing European and U.S. fiscal austerity continues to encounter substantial headwinds.

Discretion the Better Part of Valor

While austerity remains official mantra in Europe, we have noticed a not-so-subtle shift in the Continent’s view of it. With Spain struggling to overcome 27 percent unemployment, key European leaders have agreed to relax the timetable for it to achieve the Eurozone’s holy grail of reducing deficits to a rate of 3 percent of GDP or less. Of course we have to question how long it will be before other economically depressed countries on the southern periphery ask for similar treatment and, if granted, whether the hard-fought reduction of borrowing costs in southern Europe could reverse course. One key player who remains unswayed by calls to relax austerity is ECB President Mario Draghi who, in announcing another rate cut this week, implored European countries to stick to their fiscal diets. Judging by the dramatic fall of interest rates in Spain, Italy and Portugal, the sovereign debt crisis has been extinguished, at least for now. 

Distinctly Mediocre

With about 80 percent of the S&P 500 having now reported first quarter earnings, about two-thirds of companies have delivered better than expected bottom line numbers and modest levels of EPS growth, while at the same time missing top line expectations in the majority of cases.  In other words, a near repeat of what we saw at the end of 2012. The feel right now is late cycle, with companies that are offering updated financial guidance more often than not reducing their projections. A notable exception is the insurers. Aetna and Cigna both reported surprisingly good numbers and raised estimates for the year. A big question that continues to loom large is whether the HMOs will prosper under the expanded system of health insurance coverage mandated by the Affordable Care Act, which becomes law next year. Only time will tell whether the volume gains associated with additional insured lives will more than offset the potential margin headwinds of covering the previously uninsured. 

 Our Takeaways from the Week

•  The sun is beginning to set on a partly cloudy earnings season

• Stocks continue to set new highs as global central banks remain committed to unprecedented levels of monetary stimulus

Disclosures

by Brad Houle, CFA
Senior Vice President

In the not-so-distant past, Twitter was solely known as a bullhorn for celebrities, such as Paris Hilton, who would extol their wisdom – 140 characters at a time – to tens of millions of followers. Global events over the past year have catapulted Twitter into an unprecedented aspect of mainstream media – both as a lifesaving resource and a weapon for destructive pranks and rumors.

Last year, Twitter was part of electronic communication that facilitated the Arab Spring and just last week, it was used by police to inform Boston-area citizens of public safety issues following the marathon bombings. In addition, federal securities regulators have allowed the use of Twitter and Facebook as a means to disseminate potentially market-making news. On Tuesday, equity markets plunged 1 percent in three minutes due to an erroneous Associated Press tweet indicating that there were two explosions at the White House, causing injury to President Obama. The Associated Press quickly announced that their Twitter account had been hacked and the markets quickly recovered from its pandemonium. This incident exposes the razor’s edge that financial markets are on relative to news dissemination. Algorithmic and high-speed trading quickly takes over without any real evaluation of changing conditions.

This incident is reminiscent of the flash crash that occurred nearly three years ago on May 6, 2010, when the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) fell almost 1,000 points intra-day and recovered most of its loss before the close. This “crash” was the result of selling pressure from quantitative investors, as well as high-frequency trading that fed on itself. Having only begun to recoup the losses of 2008, investor confidence in the markets was rattled by this volatility as there was a growing suspicion among investors that the “game was rigged.”

This lack of confidence in the equity markets can be observed in the difference between fund flows into both equity and fixed income mutual funds. From the market bottom in March of 2009 to the end of the first quarter of 2013, investors have plowed greater than $1 trillion into bond funds and withdrawn more than $500 million from equity funds. In the first quarter this year fund flows into equity funds have turned modestly positive. While market indexes flirt with all-time highs, retail investors are largely on the sidelines in bonds or cash. 

In other market-maker news, it was a busy week for earnings releases. With the earnings season nearly half over, the largest takeaway is that results are mixed at best. Earnings have generally exceeded expectations and revenue growth that has been largely disappointing.

Our Takeaways from the Week

• This is in an environment with low expectations where company guidance was cautious coming into the quarter
• Guidance for next quarter and the remainder of the year has also been weak

 Disclosures